Whether you want to own, occupy or invest, your search ends at Karshni.Varying from consultancy services, property planning & management, facilities management, corporate real estate services, leasing, valuation or sales to commercial, retail, residential or investment property, we get you everything, exceeding your expectations by our commitment towards excellence.

Monday 27 May 2013

Wary private equities pare investments in real estate

Private equity investments in real estate dropped sharply in 2012-13 with a reduction in both the value and number of deals. Data from Venture Intelligence, a research service focussed on private equity and mergers and acquisitions, show that the realty sector announced $1.7 billion of investments from 41 deals in 2012-13 compared with $3.2 billion from 73 deals in 2011-12.

Private-equity investors have been wary of making new commitments, as they are yet to make profits on their older deals, say market experts. “Most investors who entered the market around 2007 burnt their fingers,” said Ravindra Pai, Managing Director of Bangalore-based Century Real Estate Holdings. He, however, said today, private-equity investment in real estate is primarily in the form of securitised debt and not equity.

Chinnu Senthilkumar, co-founder and a shareholder at private-equity firm Azure Capital Advisors, said that the market saw higher levels of speculation in the last five years, while expectations on returns were also unrealistic.
 
Growth story intact

But Shobhit Agarwal, Managing Director – Capital Markets, Jones Lang LaSalle India, said the current level of deals is healthy and it could rise as more investments are confirmed. “Given the current economic conditions, both globally and domestically, these figures are definitely indicative of the continued strength of the India real estate story,” he said.

Even while investments shrank, the year, however, saw the largest single private equity deal in realty since 2008. Blackstone Group, a US private-equity firm, together with Embassy Group, a real estate developer, agreed to buyout 51 per cent stake in an IT park near Bangalore for $356 million.
 
Why PE funds

Affluent investors have been investing in real estate private-equity funds, after stepping out of equity investments. They offer a simpler alternative for individual investors who may want to participate in the sector’s growth without having to deal with the legal and procedural formalities of buying property.

The funds also offer cash-strapped developers a source of funding. “Small developers have limited access to financing, especially for pre-project expenses,” says Pai.

“When such funds engage with a developer, they monitor the project effectively for quality, schedule, cost and fund management,” says Senthilkumar. He said the involvement of private fund is likely to bring in improved efficiency to end customers.
 
Future hopeful

Though there has been concern over slower sales in metros such as Mumbai, J.C. Sharma, Vice-Chairman and Managing Director of Sobha Developers, expressed optimism about the prospects of the sector as a whole.

“There is a lot of unmet demand in metros as well as smaller cities and a lot of people who have the capability to buy real estate are still holding back,” he said pointing to Sobha’s positive experiences in Bangalore, Thrissur and Gurgaon.

“Real estate investments in the last 15 years have provided good returns,” said Senthilkumar and felt it is safe to extrapolate similar returns for the next 15 years, especially with growth in tier-2 and tier-3 cities. 
 
 Meera Siva
BL Research Bureau 
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/real-estate/wary-private-equities-pare-investments-in-real-estate/article4753519.ece
Read More

Saturday 25 May 2013

LBT will lead to higher corruption: CREDAI



Creation of an additional machinery for LBT collection will only increase burden on the government and it could be avoided through just raising VAT


Opposing the Maharashtra government's decision to impose local body tax(LBT) in lieu of octroi, developers' apex body CREDAI Chairman Lalit Kumar Jain said the new levy will result in rise in corruption and be detrimental to business as well as consumers. There is a potential threat of it becoming breeding ground of corruption.

Jain, who is also the Chairman and Managing Director of Kumar Urban development Limited, said the government should instead raise VAT to compensate for octroi.

Creation of an additional machinery for LBT collection will only increase burden on the government and it could be avoided through just raising VAT. He expressed the apprehension that the new machinery and the new system of search operations that come with LBT will lead opening up another window for corruption. He also vehemently opposed the flat one per cent LBT on real estate and over and above LBT on all building material. This will only lead to increased burden on end buyers who are forced to cough up heavy amounts for a series of taxes.

"Heavy tax regime will also discourage new businesses and may even lead to a fresh capital flight out of Maharashtra, " Mr Jain said and appealed to Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan to reconsider LBT and opt for much more practical approach. He added that Maharashtra was known for trend setting approach in tax rationalisation(Maharashtra was fist to rationalise stamp duty bringing it down to 1% onwards from 10%) and pro development policies but off late we have lost that approach.
About CREDAI:

The Confederation of Real Estate Developers’ Associations of India (CREDAI) is the apex body for private real estate developers in India. CREDAI represents over 9,000 developers through 20 states chapters covering 22 States and 128 city chapters across the country. Its numerous initiatives and activities help developers come together and work towards better practices, improved customer service and a stronger realty industry.

Acting as the voice of India’s Real Estate industry, CREDAI has been the guiding force for the growing Real Estate sector in India bringing more transparency to rid the sector of its most potent virus, Corruption and Red-Tapism.
 
 
http://www.indiainfoline.com/Markets/News/LBT-will-lead-to-rise-in-corruption-CREDAI-Chairman/5684847014
Read More

Friday 24 May 2013

Reliance Property enters Kerala real estate market, signs MoU with Dewa Group

Reliance Property Solutions has entered the Kerala real estate market by signing an MoU with the Dewa Group to jointly market 'Dewa Pier 20' located here.

Promoted by a group of NRIs, the Dewa Group has an asset base of Rs 1400 crore and a capital of Rs 225 crore. The 'Dewa Pier 20' consists of 605 apartments housed in 7 towers coming up in the Marine Drive area of the city.

The Dewa Group has its registered office in Thiruvananthapuram and corporate office in Kochi. "The project was launched in 2012 and more than 100 apartments have been sold", K Venugopalan, chairman and managing director of Dewa Group said.

Reliance Property Solutions is a vertical of Reliance Home Finance Ltd. The company brings with it expertise in site selection and transaction, valuation and consulting, investments and alliances and project marketing, company spokesmen said.
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/real-estate/news/reliance-property-enters-kerala-real-estate-market-signs-mou-with-dewa-group/articleshow/20247009.cms
Read More

Thursday 23 May 2013

Real estate firms score poorly in corporate governance: study

A report by BNP Paribas Securities India Pvt. Ltd on corporate governance at eight leading Indian real estate companies found that each of them performed poorly on one or more of the parameters considered for the assessment.
 
Compensation structure, ability to retain key personnel, financial stability, pending litigation and trading in own stock were some of the criteria used to assess the management quality of Oberoi Realty Ltd, DLF Ltd, Unitech Ltd, Sobha Developers Ltd, Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd, Godrej Properties Ltd, Prestige Estates Projects Ltd and Phoenix Mills Ltd.
 
DLF and Unitech lagged behind on many of the parameters including stability of company financials and outstanding litigation, said the report. Oberoi Realty, Mahindra LifeSpaces and Godrej Properties performed poorly on compensation paid to management, trading in own stock and financial stability, respectively.
 
India’s real estate sector has often faced criticism for poor corporate governance standards and lack of transparency.
 
“No real estate company completely follows the required practices of corporate governance,” a Mumbai-based analyst privy to the BNP Paribas report said on condition of anonymity. “The assessment made in the report is just relative as there is no company better than the other as far as corporate governance is concerned.”
 
Oberoi Realty’s management emerged as one of the lowest-paid leadership teams—the total compensation on average for the last three years was 0.5% of net profit, the report said. Sobha Developers had one of the highest pay-outs at almost 6% of net profit compared with the industry average of 2.8%. Godrej Properties and Prestige Estates were also above the industry average.
 
Sobha Developers and Phoenix Mills stood out for the turnover of key personnel. Phoenix changed the composition of its board of directors eight times and Sobha changed its chief financial officer three times in the last five years.
 
“A high turnover in management impacts efficiency,” said the report. “More so, it raises concerns over the stability of the organization.”
 
The promoters of DLF and Mahindra Lifespaces were the most active traders in the stock of their own companies, with 13 and eight transactions, respectively, over the last three years.
 
“We do not think that trading in company stock by promoters or key management personnel is negative or reflects poorly on corporate governance,” the report said. “However, it cannot be ignored and if frequent it also implies promoters are focusing on the stock price rather than the core business.”
 
Based on financials like the earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) margin and profit margin, Sobha Developers, Oberoi Realty and Mahindra Lifespaces emerged as the most stable companies, and DLF and Unitech performed the worst.
 
The report also said most of the real estate companies are exposed to so-called key man risk—the impact caused by the loss of a key executive—and pending litigation/allegations are seen as contingent liability, implying a red flag against the management.
 
Sobha Developers had the lowest number of outstanding litigations against it (4) and DLF the highest at 128. However, the report gave Unitech the lowest ranking on litigation risk because of a subsidiary’s involvement in the high-profile 2G telecom spectrum case.
 
On other parameters, which include high disclosure levels, non-core diversifications, accounting policy and history of promoter-related transactions, Oberoi Realty, Sobha Developers and Mahindra Lifespaces had high rankings, while DLF, Unitech and Godrej Properties performed below average.
 
Godrej Properties declined to comment. With the exception of Sobha Developers, the other companies didn’t respond to emails sent by Mint seeking comment on the report.
 
“With reference to the ratings (by BNP Paribas), we do not know how they have been derived. In fact, with respect to different parameters mentioned for corporate governance we follow the best practices,” said Sobha Developers. “Our financial statement also shows the same.”
 
 
http://www.livemint.com/Companies/bvjMILYWvHjbpVWD9QexhN/Real-estate-firms-score-poorly-in-corporate-governance-stud.html
Read More

Wednesday 22 May 2013

RBS launches real estate services for HNIs

RBS Financial Services, a part the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, has announced the launch of Real Estate Services (RES) in India. This new initiative follows on from the launch of Wealth Planning, which was introduced last year. RES is a referral based service which will offer a comprehensive range of real estate solutions to high net-worth (HNW) clients in India.

With the new service, in-house Real Estate Specialists will work closely with clients in order to establish their goals and understand their risk appetites. They will then work with the client to guide them to a bespoke panel of real estate service providers, each of whom would be selected - after diligent analysis - on the basis of their skill, market expertise, integrity and professionalism.

Mr. Anand Moorthy, Head of Real Estate Services for RBSFinancial Services said: "Intelligent investors today are looking beyond the simple purchase of premium homes. They see potential in pre-leased commercial and retail property, as well as small office spaces, structured deals and land or plotted developments. There is a fundamental need for quality real estate solutions for domestic, non-resident, individual and institutional clients".

Mr. Shiv Gupta, Managing Director, RBS Private Banking and Director, RBS Financial Services said: "Real estate is a well understood and preferred asset class among HNWIs in India, occupying about 20-30% of the investment portfolio of a typical HNW client and in many cases, much more.

Therefore, most investment conversations are incomplete without accounting for this asset class. The ability to offer this service to our clients adds another dimension to our existing specialist coverage of other investment asset classes and to our range of products and services for high net-worth clients." 
 
 
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/real-estate/news/rbs-launches-real-estate-services-for-hnis/articleshow/20205981.cms
Read More

Tuesday 21 May 2013

Real estate sector faces drop in investments in 2012-13


sluggish economic growth and poor market sentiments are affecting the real estate sector, which saw a decline in terms of new investments in 2012-13 all over the country. The sector's investment commitment for the financial year 2012-13 was only Rs 42,000 crore, against Rs 92,600 crore in the previous financial year (2011-12), as per an analysis done by trade body Assocham with the help of the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE).

The CMIE is a business information company, which produces economic and business database and develops specialised analytical tools for decision making and research. It also deciphers trends in the economy.

Awadhesh Sharma, who did the analysis, said while the overall trend remained negative, Gujarat saw a surge of new investment commitments during the period. "The new investment commitment was Rs 2,000 cr in 2011-12, but in the last fiscal, this increased to Rs 17,000 cr," he said. Realty accounts for over 11% share in the total outstanding investments in both private and public sectors. Other states that saw an increase in new investment commitments are Kerala (550% increase), Uttarakhand (400%) and Rajasthan (175%). The rest of the states witnessed a decline of 50% in investments.

Gujarat also has the highest share of 41% in new investments attracted by the real estate sector. Gujarat is followed by Maharashtra (17%), Karnataka (10%), Tamil Nadu (8%) and Uttar Pradesh (6%).

However, in the case of total outstanding investments, Maharashtra has a 20% share. The state attracted Rs 3 lakh crore in real estate until March 2013. However, as for new investments, the state saw a drop in the last financial year, from Rs 16,000 cr to Rs 7,000 cr.

The real estate sector is facing challenges like falling sales, increasing construction costs and low market sentiment. Add to that sluggish economic growth, high interest rates, high inflation and poor industrial production due to which realtor companies are selling their land to reduce their debt.

According to an official of Jones Lang Lasalle, a leading realty firm, the last financial year was inactive, affecting all major sectors in real estate. "Office space absorption remained lower compared to 2011-12. Residential developers are struggling with unsold projects," he said. 
 
 
 
http://www.sunday-guardian.com/business/real-estate-sector-faces-drop-in-investments-in-2012-13
Read More

Sunday 19 May 2013

Hurt real estate sector reeling under sand bans

The construction industry in Goa is reeling under a double whammy-an economic slowdown-infused buyer's market and a debilitating shortage of construction material, especially sand.

While the state government has banned the extraction of sand in Goa, the Karnataka government has banned its transportation to Goa.

These developments have led to a severe scarcity of this fundamental construction material and an over 100% escalation in its price. There's also a paucity of other construction materials such as stone aggregate, rubble and laterite stones.

"The acute shortage of sand and other construction materials has led to a slowdown of construction projects," Datta Damodar Naik, managing director of a reputed Margao-based real estate firm, and former president of CREDAI (Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Associations of India) told STOI.

He explained that the months preceding the monsoon constitute the peak season for construction activities in Goa and are used to the optimum by both the organized and unorganized sectors in the construction field. This summer, construction activity has taken a hit.

Sand transporters too are a worried lot. With the transportation ban by Karnataka in place, contractors are forced to transport the sand from Karwar, Ramnagar and Londa-considered superior to Goa's local produce-on the sly and are inevitably selling it at a premium.

"Sand from the Kali riverbed in Karwar is fine and free of silt and other organic impurities. Sand extracted in Goa, on the other hand, is coarse and needs to be screened, which besides adding to the cost of labour, renders a significant portion unusable for construction work," explained N Prashant, a sand transporter.

He pointed out that the locally available sand also has high levels of salinity and is therefore not advisable for concreting work.

Stating that the transport ban has left almost 250 persons engaged in the business jobless, Prashant demanded that the state government provide them with adequate financial compensation on the lines of that being given to the mining-affected.

The escalation in prices has obviously led to a rise in the cost of construction, but builders are not keen to transfer the burden to customers owing to the already slack real estate market.

The stakeholders in the construction industry are hopeful that the new government in Karnataka will lift the ban on sand transportation to Goa.

From P1

"The real estate sector is reeling under the effects of global recession. The ban on mining in Goa has also compounded the problem. While on one side, new sales are hard to come by, old buyers are facing problems in repayment of their house loans. It's a buyer's market. Besides, in this year's state budget, the real estate industry is among the heavily taxed sectors. We are sandwiched from all sides," lamented Naik.

Considering the paucity of fundamental raw materials, what alternatives is the industry adopting?

"RMC or ready-mix concrete in one option, as sand is substantially used for concreting purpose. It's expensive, but convenient," said Naik. "Another alternative is artificial sand and since a number of plants manufacturing this have come up in Goa and neighbouring areas they can cater to Goa's requirement." He added that these moves reduce the requirement of local sand to tasks like plastering, etc.

Sources said that as an alternative to laterite stones, many construction firms have resorted to using concrete blocks. tnn
 
 
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/Hurt-real-estate-sector-reeling-under-sand-bans/articleshow/20128007.cms
Read More

Unitech to invest over Rs 500 cr to develop luxury housing

With the revival of sentiment in the property market, real estate major UnitechBSE 3.20 % is investing over Rs 500 crore on developing a luxury housing project in Gurgaon.

'The One' project will house around 300 flats, at the starting price of Rs 4.5 crore.

According to sources, Unitech is expecting an estimated sales revenue of Rs 1,500 crore from the project once it is completed by 2017.

"This is a very ambitious project for the company. It is being developed on an area spread over 16 acres. Unitech will invest over Rs 500 crore to develop the entire project," a source said.

The project, comprising six residential towers, is being developed at Sector 69 in Gurgaon and will be completed in little over four years of time.

The company started the construction about six months ago and more than 10 per cent of the work has already been completed.

"The company is going very aggressively on the project. It has already spent Rs 60 crore on construction of The One... All the funding will be done through internal accruals and sales revenue," said a source.

Once completed, Unitech is likely to generate a sales revenue of about Rs 1,500 crore from the project.

When contacted, a company spokesperson said: "The One is a premium product of Unitech. We are happy with the encouraging response from customers for The One."

He declined, however, to share any further detail on the project.

Sources said meanwhile that prices of the flats will start from Rs 4.5 crore. The average size of the flats will be around 4,500 sq ft.

The company will construct six towers in the project and each will have two flats on every floor.

The National Capital-based Unitech has total land bank of around 6,500 acres and is developing about 100 projects across the country.

In December, developers including Supertech, Ansal API and Mantri Realty had announced investments of nearly Rs 8,000 crore on various projects over the next four years, signalling bounce back of the real estate sector after a prolonged slowdown.

In addition to this, Mantri Realty had said last month that it plans to launch six housing projects within next 3-4 months to develop around 2,300 flats across the country, entailing an investment of about Rs 1,500 crore in the next three years. 
 
 
 
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/real-estate/news/unitech-to-invest-over-rs-500-cr-to-develop-luxury-housing/articleshow/20132382.cms
Read More

Saturday 18 May 2013

Home prices in metros rise over 50 per cent in 4 years



Home prices have appreciated by an average 66% in Mumbai, 52% in Gurgaon and 46% in Bangalore over the past four years, with some pockets growing nearly 100%, say property consultants, belying hopes of fall in property prices.

A limited supply of clear land, demandsupply mismatch and rising cost of inputs like steel, cement and labour have contributed to the rise in prices in most locations. "On the demand side, affordability is getting better as salaries have increased by at least 10-12% per annum in this period helping home buyers take a decision," says Niranjan Hiranandani, co-founder & chairman of Mumbai-based Hiranandani Group.


In addition, corporate investments have turned uncertain, and therefore, investors have moved to real asset classes like real estate and gold, which have became more attractive and offered better returns.

After the Lehman crisis in late 2008, property markets started to recover by 2010, but at that point, there was a huge demand-supply mismatch as many earlier projects got stalled due to the slowdown. This pushed up prices in the ensuing period, says Ajay Chandra, managing director of Unitech.

Rise in cost of construction too has been a big factor in the increase in prices. In the four-year span, construction cost has gone up by at least 30-40%.

"In this period, price of commercial space has hardly kept pace with inflation while residential property values have gone up significantly, but in select pockets of larger cities. This is a forward indicator of a positive upward trend for residential property values in the future across the other larger Indian cities," Anckur Srivasttava, chairman of GenReal Property Advisers — a real estate consulting firm.

In Mumbai though, there were other factors at play. For instance, approvals, especially environment clearances, took a lot of time in this period and because of this, most projects got delayed. "Now it takes more than two years for an approval that used to take six months earlier," says Hiranandani.

He also points to different taxes that have put pressure on pricing — be it ready reckoner rates, development charges, valueadded tax. All of these have shot up in these years. In the past four years, direct and indirect taxes together too have moved up to 32% from 12-15% in case of affordable house prices. "You name any tax or charges, and that has gone through the roof during these years," he says. Residential property prices in some parts of Mumbai have grown even faster. According to Jones Lang LaSalle, property prices in Thane have risen by 70% in the four-year period while Navi Mumbai has seen an escalation of 74% and the Malad-Borivali belt has seen an increase of 85%. 
 
 
 
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-05-16/news/39310546_1_property-prices-home-prices-navi-mumbai
Read More

Wednesday 15 May 2013

Gujarat attracts 41% investment in real estate: Assocham

The state of Gujarat has maximum share of about 41% in the new investments attracted by the real estate sector across India during the last fiscal, as per apex industry body ASSOCHAM study.

"The realty sector in India attracted new investments worth over Rs 42,000 crore as of March 2013 which slipped from over Rs 92,600 crore a year ago," according to a real estate sector specific analysis carried out by The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM).


"While most of the states have seen a decline in attracting new investments in the realty sector, Gujarat has seen a surge of over 700% as the state has attracted investments worth over Rs 17,000 crore as of March 2013 from just over Rs 2,000 crore a year ago," said Mr D.S. Rawat, national secretary general of ASSOCHAM while releasing the study on Monday.

"Kerala is another state which has seen massive growth of over 550% in attracting new investments in real estate followed by Uttarakhand (400%) and Rajasthan (175%)," said Mr Rawat. "While almost rest of the states have seen a drop of over 50% in new investments in the realty sector during the aforesaid period."

Apart from Gujarat, the states of Maharashtra (over 17%), Karnataka (10%), Tamil Nadu (8%) and Uttar Pradesh (over 6%) are amid top five states with maximum share in new investments attracted by real estate sector across India, highlights the ASSOCHAM analysis.

Besides, with a share of about 15%, Gujarat is second only to Maharashtra which has maximum share of about 20% in the total outstanding investments worth over Rs 14 lakh crore attracted by the real estate sector across India as of March 2013, according to the ASSOCHAM study.

However, the new investments in realty sector in Maharashtra have plummeted by over 55% during the last fiscal. Maharashtra has attracted outstanding investments worth about Rs three lakh crore in the real estate sector as of March 2013 but the new investments in the sector dipped from over Rs 16,000 crore to just over Rs 7,000 crore during the course of last one year (2011-12 and 2012-13).

"Realty sector accounts for over 11% share in total outstanding investments worth over Rs 122 lakh crore attracted by different sectors from various public and private sources across India," said Mr Rawat.

Maharashtra, Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh are the top five states with highest share for attracting maximum outstanding investments in the real estate segment across India. Besides, these five states account for over 70% of the total outstanding investments attracted by realty sector across India. Outstanding investments in real estate have risen by over 25% throughout the country during the five year period of 2008-09 and 2012-13, further highlighted the ASSOCHAM analysis.

According to Mr Rawat, the real estate sector in India has been plagued with serious problems of late like falling sales, rising construction costs, dampened market sentiment overall, sluggish economic growth, high interest rates, high inflation and poor industrial production ( IIP) due to which leading players in the sector had to sell of their land to reduce debt, private equity players have trimmed their exposure in realty sector and general slowdown in various industries has hit commercial real estate.
 
 
 
 
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-05-06/news/39065214_1_total-outstanding-investments-worth-mr-d-s-rawat-lakh-crore
Read More

Why Mumbai real estate rates will continue to be stable

In the Indian city which has for years carried the unwholesome reputation of being the most over-priced in terms of residential real estate valuations, there is no relief in sight for aspiring home buyers. Over the last four years, property valuations in the financial capital have increased by an average of 66 percent. All ‘expert’ predictions of an imminent correction over the last three years have proved to be wrong.

It is true that going by all known market dynamics, a correction was inevitable. Lack of affordability over an extended period is a known catalyst for downward revisions in any market category, including real estate.

One of the primary reasons for Mumbai’s ‘unreal’ price movements is the limited supply of ‘clear’ land. AFP

Another globally accepted precursor of a property market correction is a surfeit of unsold inventory. If these two indicators would have held true in Mumbai, the city’s residential real estate market should have corrected three years ago. However…

Ground Reality

Residential property prices in Mumbai have increased steadily after the correction seen post the Lehman debacle. In the period from the second quarter of 2009 to the same quarter in 2013, residential real estate prices in Mumbai have increased by 66 percent. In Thane, the increase has been even higher at 70 percent while Navi Mumbai has seen a staggering escalation of 74 percent.

Even within Mumbai, some locations have crossed the 66 percent average increase in the same period. The Malad–Borivali belt has seen an increase of 85 percent. The cumulative price escalation figures for Mumbai, Thane and Navi Mumbai represent the highest among all cities in India. During the period in question (2Q 2009-2Q 2013), Gurgaon and Bangalore – undeniably two of the hottest real estate markets in India – saw increases of 52 percent and 46 percent, respectively.

From an end-user’s perspective, Mumbai’s astronomical residential price increase is undoubtedly irrational. Below the surface, however, there are market forces at work which cannot be mitigated.

Escalation triggers

One of the primary reasons for Mumbai’s ‘unreal’ price movements is the limited supply of ‘clear’ land. Other factors at play are the reduction in new launches over a 1.5 year period from 1Q 2011 to 2Q 2012, caused largely by a slowdown in approvals for new projects, and the high interest rate scenario in 2010-2011. In this period, the government, in its efforts to curb inflation, raised lending rates around 12 times.

Every time this happened, developers’ input costs for their projects rose in tandem. The matter was further compounded by the pressure on developers to give assured return to investors who had bought into their projects at the pre-launch stage.

Meanwhile, there was a high rate of price volatility in other asset classes such as equity. This, along with the high cost of debt, brought about a massive liquidity crunch. As a result, developers’ backs were to the wall when it came to purchasing the massively priced land parcels. This limited new project launches. The historical title disputes attached to many of these plots did not help matters much, either.

In the midst of all this came the new development control rules, which caused many projects to come to a grinding halt midway as developers and architects struggled to adapt projects at various stages of development to a completely new set of mandatory guidelines.

Finally, we need to consider the phenomenon that is, in degree if not in principle, more or less unique to Mumbai – that of developers as well as buyers adopting the dubious philosophy of benchmarking prices in an particular locality based on one or two high-profile transactions or over-hyped launches.

Demand remains steady

Through it all, the demand for investment residential properties and end-user homes in the country’s financial capital has remained stable. The ever-increasing number of second home buyers within the city and the firmly entrenched – and admittedly vindicated – mind-set that real estate prices in Mumbai will never go down will ensure that the stability of Mumbai residential real estate market will continue.
 
 
 
http://www.firstpost.com/blogs/why-mumbai-real-estate-rates-will-continue-to-be-stable-777741.html?utm_source=voices&utm_medium=cat_tech
Read More

Friday 10 May 2013

West Bengal received zero investment in realty in FY'13: Report

West Bengal did not receive any investment, either foreign or domestic, in the real estate sector in the financial year 2012-13, according to a report by industry body Assocham.

"The state of West Bengal has absolutely no share in the total value of new investment commitments worth over Rs 42,000 crore made by the domestic and foreign private sources in the real estate sector across India in the last fiscal," the report which a real estate sector specific analysis and released today, said.

"Although total outstanding investments in the real estate sector in West Bengal is worth over Rs 37,000 crore as of March 2013, the state has registered a 100 per cent decline vis-a-vis new investment commitments attracted by the realty sector between 2011-12 and 2012-13," it said.

In 2011-12, the state attracted new investment commitments in the real estate sector worth over Rs 1,200 crore.

The body said while most of the states have seen a decline in attracting new investment commitments in the realty sector, Gujarat has seen a surge of over 700 per cent as the state has attracted investments worth over Rs 17,000 crore in 2012-13 from just over Rs 2,000 crore a year ago. 
 
 
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/real-estate/realty-trends/west-bengal-received-zero-investment-in-realty-in-fy13-report/articleshow/19988214.cms
Read More

Wednesday 8 May 2013

DLF gets ready to float IPP, third-biggest fundraising in Indian real estate space

DLF Ltd, the country’s largest realtor by market capitalisation, has set the ball rolling to float its institutional placement programme (IPP) which would help the firm raise fresh cash besides allowing it to meet minimum public holding norms. It has offered 81 million fresh shares in an offer which is limited to institutional shareholders.

The price of the share sale has not been frozen yet but at the current market price the firm could raise around Rs 1,940 crore ($358 million). This would be the biggest IPP issue in India and the third-biggest fund raising exercise ever in the real estate space in the country.

The previous two big ticket funding too happened in DLF. The firm had raised over Rs 9,000 crore (over $2 billion then) six years ago as IPO. It soon followed it up with $600 million funding from Lehman Brothers and DE Shaw for DLF Assets. These two funding transactions were executed close to the peak of the stock market boom.

Although there were a few more large funding transactions in dollar terms, given the depreciation of the Indian currency this would be by far the third-largest such fund raising in the real estate sector ever.

As many as eight merchant banks have been roped in as book running lead managers. These include JP Morgan, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Standard Chartered, CLSA, HSBC, Kotak Mahindra and UBS. India Infoline is the co-book running lead manager to the large issue.

VCCircle had first reported on April 5 that DLF hired JP Morgan, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Standard Chartered as the investment bankers for the share sale programme.

The move is in line with SEBI’s guidelines stipulating 25 per cent minimum public shareholding for a listed company. The promoters held 78.58 per cent stake in the firm as of March 31, 2013. The IPP will dilute their holding to 75 per cent to meet the listing norms.

DLF intends to use the money mainly for the repayment of borrowings, general corporate purposes, working capital requirements and capital expenditure.

The company had net debt of Rs 21,433 crore as of December 31, 2012, and has been selling non-core assets to raise cash to retire some of the debt on its books.

DLF’s shares closed at Rs 239.35 a share, up 2.81 per cent, on the Bombay Stock Exchange on Tuesday.

The company had come with its IPO at an issue price of Rs 525 a share and has seen the prices tank, like most other real estate firms, over the past few years.

BHAWNA GUPTA
Read More

Poke Me: Why real estate is a bad long term investment

Ajay Shah, Professor, NIPFP 

Most people in India are convinced that real estate is a great asset. More caution is in order.Real estate investment is not a guarantee of profit. It is hard to be diversified, and illiquidity hampers portfolio structuring. Most important, the outlook for supply over the medium term implies that there is no great upside. 

Too many intelligent people in India believe that one can never do wrong by investing in real estate. Some facts will help bring more sense. Consider investing in the best commercial real estate of Bombay -- Nariman Point -- in 1994. The price was Rs.35,000 per square foot. Today, almost 20 years later, the price is Rs.25,000 a square foot. 

Over this period, Nifty produced returns of 362%. Inflation ate away 272%. Net of inflation, Nifty delivered an average annual return of 1% while Nariman Point commercial real estate delivered -9%. 

This is, of course, just an anecdote. Many individual real estate investments have done very well and have occasionally outperformed equities. My point is a limited one. We should not mindlessly assume that real estate is always a good investment. We should not assume that real estate will always outperform equities -- as the above example shows things can be as bad as underperformance (compared with the Nifty index fund) of 10 percentage points per year over a 19 year period. 

Why did Nariman Point underperform over this period? Because of new supply. That is the heart of the problem of real estate as an asset class. There is no long term returns in owning steel or bricks. Every time there is a real estate boom, it triggers off fresh construction. This supply quenches the boom. 

Bombay is a pretty bad place in terms of availability of space, because of both geography and governance. Elsewhere in India, the case against real estate is even stronger. The government in India is slow to build roads and water supply and police stations in outlying areas. But with a lag, these facilities do come about. Ultimately, when the price of structures exceeds the price of bricks and steel, new supply emerges, which is bad for real estate prices. The rise of a professional real estate industry, coupled with access to formal finance including foreign capital, has increased the scale of supply and given bigger and faster corrections. 

Some claim that India has a large population and there is a shortage of land. A little arithmetic shows this is not the case. If you place 1.2 billion people in four-person homes of 1000 square feet each, and two workers of the family into office/factory space of 400 square feet, this requires roughly 1% of India's land area assuming an FSI of 1. There is absolutely no shortage of land to house the great Indian population. 

The biggest story about the future of real estate prices in India is the FSI. In most of India, the FSI is below 2. This is an abysmally small number by global standards. All over Asia, FSIs are above 5, going up to 20 or to no limit. In the long run, politicians in India will see the light and FSI will rise. A higher FSI results in lower rental rates for households and firms, as was seen in Hyderabad which was a pioneer in FSI reform. When FSI goes up, this will unleash supply on a big scale. As an example, if Bombay moves from an FSI of 1 to 2 -- which would still make it worse than the FSI seen anywhere else in Asia -- this would trigger off a doubling of supply. 

These arguments are not specific to India. While datasets about real estate investments over long time periods are not easy to come by, academic evidence is slowly building up of fairly poor returns to real estate. Net of inflation, real estate tends to produce roughly 0 over long periods, while equity indexes produce significant and positive returns after inflation. 

Finally there are the practical difficulties of diversification and liquidity. Most people are not rich enough to buy 50 properties spread across India. Buying and selling involves very large transactions costs and delays, and generally involves black money. 

Skepticism is in order. If less than 1% of the land area of India is built out, this is enough for the entire population. There is no long-run return in hoarding bricks and steel. Real estate booms the world over are quenched by supply. The prospect of holding real esate in India is worse because FSIs are tiny. In the future, FSIs will go up, which will further fuel supply. Households investing in real estate are also hurting on account of inadequate diversification, illiquidity and the use of cash.



Read More

Tuesday 7 May 2013

State attracts highest investment in commercial real estate: report

Maharashtra has attracted an outstanding investment of Rs. 3 lakh crore in real estate, which is highest among states in India. However, the slowdown in real estate was visible as new investments in this sector dropped by 55% to Rs. 7,000 crore from Rs. 16,000 crore the previous year.

These are the findings of a study conducted by Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM), which tracked the investments in the real estate sector.

DS Rawat, national general secretary, ASSOCHAM, said, “The realty sector accounts for over 11% share in total outstanding investments worth over Rs. 122 lakh crore attracted by different sectors from various public and private sources across India. However, the new investments in real estate have dried by over 54% as the sector has been jostling with slowing sales and rising inventories.”

Maharashtra, Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh are the top five states with highest shares for attracting maximum outstanding investments in the real estate segment across India. Besides, these five states account for over 70% of the total outstanding investments attracted by the realty sector across India.

But it was Gujarat that emerged as the leading player, attracting maximum investments in the realty sector — over Rs. 17,000 crore in March 2013, from just over Rs. 2,000 crore the previous year — registering a growth of over 730%.

According to ASSOCHAM, the realty sector has been plagued with several issues. “Various problems like falling sales, rising construction costs, a dampened market sentiment overall, sluggish economic growth, high interest rates, high inflation and poor industrial production, and a general slowdown in various industries has hit commercial real estate,” said Rawat.

He added that developments like the parliament’s approval of foreign direct investment in multi-brand retail could boost foreign investments, which would ultimately boost the demand for commercial real estate in the country.


Read More

Does demand really drive real estate prices?

Economic logic says that prices are a function of demand and supply. If demand increases prices rise and vice versa. However, it seems that the real estate industry is an exception to this economic logic. For instance, property prices in Mumbai during the last quarter rose to a record high despite slowing sales. Weak sales mean that there is no demand. But yet the prices have refused to correct. In fact, during the quarter ending March 31, prices in Mumbai increased 2.9% as per a leading real estate research agency.

So, why is there such disconnect between prices and demand? Let us try and understand. Basically there are two reasons why prices continue to remain high. The first reason is vested interests of politicians and second is the prevalence of black money which is doing rounds in the system.

Now, it is a known fact that most politicians have vested interests in real estate projects. Thus, they will not take any move that will impact the property prices. For instance, property prices are rising due to scarcity of land. But the government can easily raise the floor space index (FSI) to overcome the scarcity issue. If it is done more vertical structures will come into the market with huge inventory. This will hurt the prices as inventory builds up. However, the government will never take such a decision.

Secondly, most of the black money of major politicians is invested in real estate. Since this money has no other avenue it keeps on moving in the real estate market. The reason it has no other avenue is because if invested elsewhere the source of income will have to be revealed. Thus, it will catch the taxmen's eye. As such, this black money keeps on revolving in the real estate market. And this artificially bids up the prices.

The external support provided by banks (read government) is also noteworthy. Most builders get their loans from banks. Just in case they are unable to repay on time there are various provisions that enable the bank to not classify the asset as non-performing. Instead, these loans get restructured. Now, since the loans don't get classified as NPAs, banks do not incur any additional provisioning. As such, their net profits remain intact. Hence, they will not pressurize builders to repay on time. The end result is prices remain high as builders continue to hold on to their inventory. If these loans are classified NPAs banks will pressurize builders to repay on time and thus there can be some inventory liquidation in the market that can help reduce the prices.

Overall, it seems that property prices are not just a function of demand and supply. In fact, the prices are dictated by the government. And since the government via politicians has vested interest in the sector correction looks like a far distant reality.


By Equitymaster – India's leading 'independent' equity research initiative. Trusted by over a million members all over the world, Equitymaster is known for its well-researched, unbiased and honest opinions on theIndian stock markets.


Read More

Monday 6 May 2013

At Rs 17,000 cr, Gujarat topped in realty investments last fiscal: Study

Gujarat has cornered the maximum share, 41 per cent, of new investments attracted by the real estate sector across India during the last fiscal, apex industry body Assocham said on Monday.

“The realty sector in India attracted new investments worth over Rs 42,000 crore as of March 2013, which slipped from over Rs 92,600 crore a year ago,” according to a real estate sector specific analysis carried out by The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (Assocham).

“While most of the States have seen a decline in attracting new investments in the realty sector, Gujarat has seen a surge of over 700 per cent as the State has attracted investments worth over Rs 17,000 crore as of March 2013 from just over Rs 2,000 crore a year ago,” said D.S. Rawat, National Secretary-General, Assocham, while releasing the analysis.

Kerala has also seen massive growth of over 550 per cent in attracting new investments in real estate, followed by Uttarakhand (400 per cent) and Rajasthan (175 per cent), while most of the States have seen a drop of over 50 per cent in new investments in the realty sector during the period under review.

Apart from Gujarat, Maharashtra (over 17 per cent), Karnataka (10 per cent), Tamil Nadu (eight per cent) and Uttar Pradesh (over six per cent) are the top five States with maximum share in new investments attracted by the real estate sector across India. New investments in the realty sector in Maharashtra have plummeted by over 55 per cent during the last fiscal, from Rs 16,000 crore to Rs 7,000 crore.

“The realty sector accounts for over 11 per cent share in total outstanding investments worth over Rs 122 lakh crore, attracted by different sectors from various public and private sources across India,” said Rawat.

Gujarat, Maharashtra, Haryana, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh are the top five States with the highest share for attracting maximum outstanding investments in the real estate segment across India. Besides, these five States account for over 70 per cent of the total outstanding investments attracted by the realty sector across India.

The outstanding investments in real estate have risen by over 25 per cent throughout the country during the five-year period from 2008-09 and 2012-13.

“The real estate sector in India has been plagued by serious problems including falling sales, rising construction costs, dampened market sentiment overall, sluggish economic growth, high interest rates, high inflation and poor industrial production (IIP) due to which leading players in the sector had to sell their land to reduce debt, private equity players have trimmed their exposure in the realty sector and a general slowdown in various industries has hit commercial real estate,” he said.

“However, certain positive developments such as Parliament’s approval of foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail would help attract foreign investments and give a fillip to the retail industry and simultaneously boost the demand for commercial real estate in the country.”



Read More

Sunday 5 May 2013

Don't bet just on real estate - Hindustan Times

Real estate remains the hottest savings bets for individuals with most Indians preferring to park their surplus income in these assets despite a robust turnaround in equity markets with the BSE-Sensex looking to good to scale back up to 20,000.

Rakesh Singhal, 36, a multinational bank employee spends about Rs.1.04 lakh or 40% of his monthly income of Rs. 2.6 lakh in paying off a home loan taken three years ago. It is an investment decision he is keen on repeating if his income rises appropriately, given that the property's value has already risen by 35%.

Singhal also sets aside a tiny fraction of his disposable income for two life insurance policies and a public provident fund (PPF) account.

Financial planners said the mindset that real estate is risk free and fetches the healthiest returns has goaded people into investing more in properties rather than other assets such as equities and bank deposits (see graphic).

Experts, however, warned the quantum of returns should not be sole determinant and diversifying the savings portfolio was important.

"If you need instant cash on a short notice, you may not get it and often you need to wait for a couple of months or even more to get your property sold off, especially with the slowdown in the economy," said Surya Bhatia, principal consultant, Asset Manager.

Maneesh Kumar, director, Burgeon Wealth Advisors echoed similar views.

"You often don't find a well thought out and well planned investment pattern, people generally tend to direct their funds into a particular asset class which is highly risky," Kumar said.

"The ground rule is that one should invest one third of his income while his expense should never exceed one third. One third should be spent on repaying debt," said Ranjeet Mudholkar, CEO, Financial Planning Standard Board of India.


Read More

Saturday 4 May 2013

Things improving for real estate

Since the sub-prime collapse of 2008, there have been recurrent questions about India's real estate sector. In the past three years, listed Indian real estate companies had very poor returns. The real estate business has seen a cash crunch, in part because the RBI raised prudential norms. Projects have stalled. Mortgage offtake has slowed. There is commercial space to spare. However, real estate prices have not fallen much. Nor has there been a very large number of mortgage defaults.

Nobody seems to believe Indian real estate could collapse. There have actually been multiple real estate bubbles in India and property prices have declined substantially in several periods - during 1996-2002 for instance. But the psychological belief that "property is safe" is strong despite evidence to the contrary.

There are also concrete reasons why Indian real estate is unusual. One is that legal hurdles and long processes restrict supply. New real estate takes a long time to be developed because multiple clearances from multiple authorities, changes in land use, FSI norms, and so on, are difficult to negotiate.

A more ticklish issue is the prevalence of black money in Indian real estate transactions. The white component of a real estate deal is the official price declared in the registration. This is generally close to official valuations. The black component is cash paid under the table. The black component may range from nominal, to a third or half of total price. On average, the black component can be estimated as 25-35 per cent of price by comparing prevailing rates with official rates.

Rampant tax evasion aside, there are other interesting consequences. These are not necessarily bad. The black component adds an extra layer of buyer commitment. Consider the following situation. An individual buys a property, taking out a mortgage for say, 80 per cent of value. The buyer puts down 20 percent. There is a crash. Let's say, within six months of the deal, the property's value falls by say, 25 per cent. The buyer may then decide to cut losses and default.

This scenario played out during the US sub-prime collapse. Many mortgages were for 95-99 per cent of property value. The cascading effect led to steeper falls in real estate prices and triggered more defaults. Similar scenarios played out in Spain and Ireland.

Defaults are less likely when the buyer has put down 35-40 per cent of original value. The sunk cost, and hence, the commitment, is higher. Indian mortgages are calculated only on the white component and not usually sanctioned for above 75 per cent of the white value. Hence, a mortgage is usually for 55-65 per cent of total price. Indian buyers always commit a large proportion of their own funds. Hence, multiple mortgage defaults with a cascading effect are less likely in India.

A large black component also means that the usual valuation matrices do not hold. For example, one may compare rental yield (rent as a percentage of property value) with a risk-free return from a fixed deposit. Put simply, can a property owner sell, park sales proceeds in an FD, rent the sold property back and have a surplus? If so, the rental yield is too low and the property is over-valued.

This calculation needs adjustment in India because the black component earns little or no interest. The black:white ratio must be estimated to calculate fair valuations. For example, suppose the rental yield on the total price of a property is 5 per cent, while the fixed deposit interest rate is 7 per cent. The black component is 30 per cent of the total price. Despite the 200 basis point spread between the rental yield and FD yield, the property is near fair-value. If the property was sold, only 70 per cent of the realised price could be parked in FDs.

In combination, these distortions jack up Indian real estate prices abnormally. It is ridiculous, but true, that India with a nominal per capita of $1490 has real estate prices comparable to the US (per capita of $49,900) and Japan ($46,700).

The premium valuations of Indian real estate is likely to continue unless and until there are massive, far-reaching reforms across tax structures, land acquisition laws, conversion laws, ceilings, and so on. That's certainly not happening any time soon.

In the short term, falling interest rates should be beneficial for the real estate sector. It helps developers borrow relatively cheaply, and it creates demand. The retail customer is tempted to take out mortgages if they think rates will fall. Hence, battered real estate shares could bounce much more sharply than most people anticipate through the next year.


Read More

Real estate is an ideal investment vehicle, says expert

Real estate has “consistently proven itself as an ideal investment vehicle” and is an essential component of any investment portfolio.

For those looking for something that is a safe bet and does not call for deep knowledge of the business or intricate planning, real estate is the best option, said Arun Kumar, Managing Director, Casa Grande.

The rationale behind this optimism is backed by a fundamental factor – demand and supply, he said. India has nearly one-sixth the world’s population but just about three per cent of the land mass. Demand for land is growing in cities, in rural areas, and for industry and commerce. Prices are bound to be buoyant in the long run. Over a seven-year period, the capital appreciation can be15-25 per cent.

EVOLVING BIZ

Speaking at a seminar on the second-day of the Business Line Investment Opportunities Fair, a two-day event presented by the NSE, the Chennai-based real estate developer said the business is evolving into an organised and regulated activity. More people have surplus cash and this has contributed to a growing market. Policy support and a healthy housing loan market have contributed to the growth, he said.

Primarily, location is the key factor in the level of appreciation of value. The key market triggers are the availability of infrastructure, connectivity and potential to grow. For instance, when Casa Grande promoted a 250-villa project in Sriperumbudur, an industrial suburb of Chennai, the project was sold out in two to three days, he said.

Investors need to vet the land documents carefully, study the track record of the developer and be clear about the investment goal. Residential projects in the suburbs priced around Rs 4,000-5,000 a sq ft in a good location offer adequate head room for appreciation, he said.

ENGINES OF GROWTH

Real estate and construction are an indispensable component of economic growth – it is among the largest job generators, second only to agriculture, and drives the growth of over 200 industries, including large ones such as cement and steel. It accounts for about 5 per cent of the GDP.

While the mood in the real estate sector is sombre as of now (a trend that is likely to remain for a couple of quarters more), it is sure to pick up after that, Kumar said.

In the commercial space – office and industry – companies are in a ‘wait and watch’ mode because of the overall economic scenario. In the hospitality sector too, there is untapped potential.

RETAIL SPACE

There is ‘more excitement’ in the retail space with the FDI policy on investment in retail in place. Malls are being developed across cities including in Tier II towns and cities. Space is in demand and this has attracted funds such as Blackstone Capital which has invested over Rs 1,200 crore in the last two years.

But the housing space constitutes the lion’s share of the sector.

Smaller cities such as Chennai and Bangalore hold huge potential as real estate investment destinations. Chennai, with its diversified industrial base, and Bangalore, with its reputation as a cosmopolitan city, are attracting investors. Planned satellite cities, improved connectivity and social infrastructure will further drive growth, he said.



Read More

Friday 3 May 2013

Realtors welcome rate cut; seek more reduction to boost sector

NEW DELHI: Welcoming the RBI decision to cut key policy rates by 0.25 per cent, the real estate sector today said there is a need for further reduction so that the interest cost to builders and home buyers falls considerably. 

"We sincerely hope that the RBI will keep up the trend of repo rate cut and facilitate a fall in interest rates so that EMI burden on common house buyer gets reduced considerably," Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Associations of India (CREDAI) Chairman Lalit Kumar Jain said in a statement. 

CREDAI has over 10,000 members across the country. The Reserve Bank today cut the short-term lending rate, or repo, by just 0.25 per cent to 7.25 per cent and kept the liquidity enhancing cash reserve requirement unchanged. 

Country's largest realty firm DLFBSE -3.18 % said that the rate cut was "too little" to boost realty sector as well as economy. 

Commenting on the policy, DLF Group Executive Director Rajeev Talwar said: "The rate cut is too little to give economy a boost. There is a need for further reduction". 

However, he said that if the banks and housing finance companies pass on the rate cut to consumers, it would have a positive impact on the sector. 

Echoing similar views, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) South Asia Managing Director Sachin Sandhir, welcomed the rate cut by the RBI. However, he said the realty sector requires more such incentives. 

"To revive investments in the sector, we hope the apex bank would continue monetary easing in the coming months and would further reduce the rates," Sandhir said. 

PropEquity Founder and CEO Samir Jasuja said: "We welcome the repo rate cut of 25 basis points by RBI in the latest credit policy review. However the real estate sector requires larger cuts in the repo rate and we hope RBI continues monetary easing in the coming months." 

Assotech Managing Director Sanjeev Srivastva termed the repo rate cut as "a good move" and hoped that the rate cut would be passed on to consumers by financial institutions. 

"It will boost the situation of recent sluggishness in investment activity and domestic sentiments because interest rate is an important component in driving the economy. It is although small in percentage but a good sentiment booster," Srivastva said. 

CREDAI stressed the need for the RBI formulating a special policy for the housing industry with focus on affordable housing. It urged RBI to remove negative weightage given to the real estate industry so that the commercial banks took a pragmatic and practical view of housing sector.

Read More
Designed By Seo Blogger Templates