Whether you want to own, occupy or invest, your search ends at Karshni.Varying from consultancy services, property planning & management, facilities management, corporate real estate services, leasing, valuation or sales to commercial, retail, residential or investment property, we get you everything, exceeding your expectations by our commitment towards excellence.

Monday 30 September 2013

How some regulatory changes may increase cost of real estate for buyers

In recent times, the real estate sector has seen several regulatory changes and more are in the works. While most of these changes are aimed at protecting buyers' interests, some of them carry a cost.

Here is a look at how they will affect your interests and your pocket.

New Land Acquisition Bill

The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2012, was passed during the monsoon session of the Parliament. The basic goal of this legislation is to improve the compensation paid to landowners, whose land is taken over for industrialisation, infrastructure development and urbanisation. One key provision of the Bill is that the minimum payment to the landowner will be twice the market value in urban areas and four times in rural areas.

On the positive side, the major grievance of landowners—that they are paid a low compensation in lieu of their land—has been adequately addressed. Says Anuj Puri, chairman and country head, Jones Lang Lasalle India: "Litigation and related costs can be expected to decline."

Fears have been expressed that this legislation will raise the cost of land acquisition for developers and, hence, make real estate more expensive for the end-user. This is only partly true. The provisions of the Bill apply only if the developer is trying to acquire at least 50 acres of urban land or 100 acres of rural land. "Most residential, commercial and retail real estate projects are developed on smaller parcels of land," points out Sanjay Dutt, executive MD, South Asia, Cushman & Wakefield India. So, small acquisitions will be exempt from the provisions of this Bill.

A developer wanting to build a large township will, however, have to bear the brunt of the Bill's provisions. "The enhanced compensation clause and the R&R (resettlement and rehabilitation) clause will have a direct cost implication," says Puri.

The way 'market value' has been defined could also lead to an incorrect assessment of the price of land. "Since the market value will be determined on the basis of registered sale deeds, where the price is significantly under-reported, the Bill adopts an arbitrary multiplier to inflate the value," says Sachin Sandhir, managing director of RICS India, a company that deals in professional qualification and setting of standards in the field of real estate. He adds that for the land market in India to function efficiently, the Bill should have adopted internationally recognised valuation standards.

The Bill also requires that a private acquirer must get the consent of 80% of landowners. Getting the consent of such a large majority is always difficult. "The consent clause has the potential to delay the start of projects," says Puri.

Both higher compensation and delay in acquisition are expected to have a cascading effect on project costs and could lead to higher prices being charged from buyers in large township projects.

Due to the high rate of migration from rural to urban areas, developing a large number of new townships has become imperative in India. This is the only way to relieve population pressure building up in cities. However, as Dutt of CWI says, "The new Bill will make the task of developing large cities more difficult."



Read More

UP ranks highest in new investments in real estate sector

UP has been ranked top with maximum share of about 40% in the new investments attracted by real estate sector among top 20 states across the country during the first quarter of current fiscal, industry body ASSOCHAM said today.

Interestingly, the total new investments in real estate sector across the country had dipped by over 50% during the course of past one year.

The top 20 states of India had attracted new investments worth over Rs 11,905 crore in the Q1 of FY 12-13 as against Rs 5,884 worth of new investments in Q1 of this fiscal.

"UP has attracted new investments in the real estate sector worth about Rs 2,350 crore in Q1 of FY 13-14 as against Rs 1,500 crore worth of new investments attracted by the state during corresponding period of last year," according to a paper titled 'Current State of Real Estate Sector in India and It's Revival,' released by The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM).

However, timely completion of ongoing projects has remained a major concern for a long-time in the state, said D S Rawat, national secretary general of ASSOCHAM, while releasing the chamber's paper.

"Real estate projects worth over Rs 2,971 crore got completed during the Q1 of FY 13-14 across India, thereby registering over 50% growth in rate of project completion as realty projects worth only Rs 1,976 crore had got completed in Q1 of the previous financial year," Rawat said.

"With a share of about 10% in total outstanding investments worth over Rs 14 lakh crore attracted by top 20 states in the real estate sector as of June 2013, UP ranks fifth with outstanding investments worth over Rs 1.4 lakh crore in the realty sector, Rawat said.

With real estate projects worth over Rs 1.3 lakh crore under implementation in UP, the state commands a share of about 14% in realty projects out of a total of over Rs 9.4 lakh crore under implementation across top 20 states of the country, the ASSOCHAM paper said.

India's construction sector comprising of townships, housing, built-up infrastructure and construction development projects has attracted a cumulative foreign direct investment (FDI) of over $22 billion during April 2000-June 2013, highlighted the ASSOCHAM paper.

Maharashtra alone accounts for highest share of about 20% with outstanding investments worth about Rs 3 lakh crore. It is followed by Gujarat (15%), Haryana (12%), Karnataka (12%), Uttar Pradesh (10%) and Andhra Pradesh (10%).

Followed by UP, the state of Maharashtra has acquired second highest share of 17% in attracting new investments in realty sector in Q1 of FY 13-14 followed by Tamil Nadu (17%), Uttarakhand (9%) and Karnataka (6%) that are amid top five states in this regard.

Read More

Friday 27 September 2013

India's top housing market headed for correction?

Mumbai saw its most expensive apartment sale on record last month, with a sea-facing duplex located in the highly sought after Malabar Hill area fetching a staggering $9.1 million, according to local media reports.

This record-breaking sale stands in stark contrast to growing pessimism over the broader outlook for Mumbai's subdued residential property market, which faces a subdued job market, lower household incomes and higher interest rates. 

The combination is increasing the risk of a home-price correction in India's financial center over the coming months, analysts say, noting housing prices in Mumbai have risen nearly 70 percent over the past four years.

"With sentiment low, only buyers that are from double-income households or [are] financially well-off are committing to real estate; the majority remain cautious. Investors also aren't active in the market, they are waiting on the fence," Sanjay Dutt, executive managing director for South Asia at Cushman & Wakefield told CNBC.

Inventory levels in the city have risen to around 48 months, double the 20-24 month level regarded as healthy, according to Jones Lang La Salle. Meanwhile, sales volumes have slowed considerably from around 17,000 units in the fourth quarter of 2011 to 11,800 units in the second quarter of 2013, according to data from Knight Frank.

"The pile up of inventory is alarming. Adding to this, developers' financial conditions are stressed. Their revenue streams have dried up due to falling sales," said Samantak Das, director, research and advisory service at Knight Frank India.

Many of the country's real estate developers are saddled with high debt levels brought on by ambitious expansion plans in the recent years. And with banks shying away from lending in the face of rising non-performing loans and private equity funds exiting the Indian market, their funding options are becoming increasingly limited, Das noted.

"The best way for them to resolve this is to increase sales by softening their prices as far as possible to invite buyers, [though] it's difficult to say when they will," he added.

Critical period

The next six months will be a critical period for developers to assess whether or not they need to cut prices, analysts say, as upcoming religious festivals including Diwali, which falls in November, and Gudi Padwa next March are regarded as an auspicious time to buy real estate.

"Developers are doing their best to hang on as we're near the beginning of the festive season in India - when they see maximum activity. They are banking on this period to bail them out," said Ashutosh Limaye, head of research and real estate investment services at Jones Lang LaSalle India. 

At the moment, developers are attempting to lure buyers by offering incentives such as discounts of around 5 percent for a limited period, absorbing stamp duty charges, or providing furnished homes, he said.

"All indicators hint that a price correction is due, sales during the festive season will really tell us," Limaye said.

10-20 percent correction

Dutt of Cushman & Wakefield forecasts a 10-20 percent drop in new home prices between now and next March. He expects a 5-10 percent correction in projects that are already under construction, and a 10-20 percent correction in new launches where construction has not yet begun.

"New launches are where the majority of developers will give higher discounts because they want to fund construction. That's where the pain is because if you have purchased land [and] spent money on taxes, you're incurring losses every day," Dutt said. 

As for homes that are ready for occupation, prices are likely to remain well supported as there is sufficient demand from genuine end-users, said analysts.

"The resale market and ready-to-move market always have an upper hand. The consumers know what they are buying, and the risk of completion isn't there...completion of projects is a big question mark in this environment," said Das of Knight Frank India.



Read More

Saturday 21 September 2013

India and sustainable real estate

By Rajat Malhotra, Director - Engineering & Operations Solutions (West Asia), Jones Lang LaSalle India 

The real sector has emerged as one India's largest drivers of economic growth. As a sector, it provides large scale employment and contributes significantly to the GDP. For decades, environmentalists have been warning that frenetic human economic activity associated with the breakneck speed of economic growth is placing a huge strain on the earth and its natural resources. 

Of course, we keep pushing those limits back with clever new technologies; yet eco-systems are undeniably in decline. Since real estate is emphatically driving this growth, it is also directly impacting the environment. Sustainable development is all about minimizing this impact and ensuring we keep the planet green and alive. 

Sustainability is often misunderstood as curtailing use and stifling developmental activity. Nothing can be farther from the truth. The number of certified green buildings in India has witnessed a four-fold growth in the last 4 years. This is testimony to the growing popularity of the concept. If one goes by the published statistics on the IGBC website there are currently 223 registered green buildings in the country. 

As an absolute number the growth has been more than four folds in the last 4 years, but is it enough? Hardly! The commercial real estate stock in the top seven cities alone is approximated at 310 million sqft. Further, the forecast is that commercial real estate development will grow at an annual rate of 8-10%. With this backdrop, the number of projects committed to green design and construction are minuscule. 

So how does one transform 'going green' from a campaign of a select few to a mass movement? One obvious factor is awareness. The second most important factor is aligning Corporate Sustainability Goals with real estate selection. 

 Green spaces not only allow for 14 to 16 per cent increase in productivity but also reduce the operational cost of the building, consume less energy, water and other resources, leading to office which more environmentally responsible and has a lower carbon footprint. 

 Thanks to the efforts of the Indian Green Building Council (IGBC), awareness in the corporate world has increased and green space has increased from 20,000 sq ft to about 730 million sq ft since the inception of IGBC. Though trend is commendable, there is a long way to go - awareness among end users is still limited and demand for green buildings needs to rise a lot more. 

For greater all-round awareness, certain myths first need to be dispelled: 

Myth #1: Green buildings cost more: The incorporation of basic green features, if done right at the preliminary design phase, will not impact the overall initial project costs by much. Typically, the increase in cost will be between 5-15 %. Some project developers claim no increase in initial project cost because of diligent planning. The benefits of green buildings can be realized fully if the following points are understood in depth: 

The returns must be calculated on "Total Cost of Ownership" (Initial cost + Recurring O&M costs) rather than only on the "Initial Costing". Typically more than 90% of the total cost of ownership of a building is attributable to its operating and maintenance cost. Energy accounts for 50 % of the O&M cost. Green buildings help reduce energy spends significantly. This itself ensures that the initial investment is recovered within a typical period of 5 years. · 

Some of the green building benefits (like improved indoor environment quality, improved productivity) are intangible, which affects the ROI. These should be accounted for while formulating the cost and benefit analysis. 

Myth #2: A certification is the only way out: Certification is a way to validate and rate the features one has incorporated in a project, by an independent body. The certification is a voluntary process, and the project proponents may go ahead only by incorporating the green features without having to certify them. 

Myth #3: The market demand for green spaces will wane: With the onset of growing awareness about sustainability and the rapidly increasing effects of climate change, the market demand is set to only to grow. It is only a matter of time before regulatory stipulates come into play. The Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC) is already mandated for all new construction government buildings. If the ECBC is made mandatory for certain classes of buildings then it will become compulsory for each building to meet the baseline at least for conserving energy through optimal building design set by the Government of India. 

Myth #4: Green buildings are for other countries, not ours: India is the second-most populous country in the world and if experts are to be believed, it is en route to pip China from 1st rank by 2025. This only points towards an ever increasing pressure on our already scarce natural resources. The growth forecast in the real estate segment is anywhere between 8 to 10 % annually. 

India lies in the tropical zone with enough sun and precipitation (4,000 trillion litres) throughout the year, and it is imperative that we harvest both. Therefore from both the opportunity and requirement perspectives this is 'going green' in our real estate developments is as important for us as it is for any other nation. 

Corporates who have sustainability goals need to extend their efforts to real estate selection. For example, a sustainability-oriented corporate looking for an office space would only go for green space to account for reduction of their overall carbon footprint. Such extension of sustainability goals would lead to a further increase of green spaces. 

Today, we have a star rating system in India for buildings based much on the same principle concept of energy star rating systems for consumer products. The catch, however, is that today everything is voluntary. If one chooses to develop 'green' real estate, the options are aplenty, but it depends totally on the choice of the developer. To say up front that regulatory stipulates will help would be stating too much too soon. Incentivized performance is the key. For example, structured avenues delineated in the new Companies Bill would aid voluntarism, so to speak.

Incentives would surely act as a catalyst for the development and absorption of new green buildings, but some regulatory norms would be of great help to convert the already existing energy guzzlers. Moreover, norms for existing building would also help the new green spaces of the future to maintain their own standards throughout their life-cycle. 

Clearly, the buildings of the future will hold the key to restoration of the ecological balance that is so precariously perched on a knife edge today. We need to act now to prevent a downward spiral to complete ecological destruction. 

About The Author: Rajat Malhotra is the head of the Jones Lang LaSalle's best practice platform; Engineering and Operations Solutions for West Asia. The EOS group provides subject matter expertise support to IFM and other business lines in the domains of Sustainability, Environment Health & Safety and Critical Engineering. The Energy and Sustainability Services (ESS) vertical covers the entire gamut of consulting from portfolio sustainability advisory services, energy audits, building certifications and design reviews.

Read More

Thursday 19 September 2013

Impact of Real Estate Bill on the property markets

Sulekha.com 

The real estate bill has perhaps been the most debated topics of the year. The attention that this piece of legislation has garnered has been tremendous. This could be due to the fact that the bill encompasses the interests of a large section of the populace.

It is also because of the fact that this is the probably the most definitive legislation on the sector yet. Now that the bill has been passed it is necessary to understand the pros and cons of the bill in present form as it soon becomes a law. 

There has been as much criticism against the bill as has been the praise in support of the bill. Many see it as a ploy by the Government to initiate such an important statute in the fag end of their term or in other words just before the general elections. 

However, despite that line of thought a large part of the population is still thankful for the passage of the long-pending regulation. 

Ever since the bill was announced suggestions and critiques started pouring in. When the law comes into force there are many changes and amendments to the act that could be expected after checking the practical applications of the bill.

The points in favour of the bill: 

1. No more delays in delivery of projects: 
The buyers can sit happily on their investments as the current bill seeks to totally eliminate the delays that one encounters after paying up for the house. There are very many cases where the builders usually fail to meet the deadlines in releasing the allotted homes to the buyers. 

The bill will henceforth standardize such procedures and in case this practice continues, the buyer can claim back the full amount invested along with interest that will be applicable for that specific period of time. 

2. Definitions are to be made clear: 
The definitions of the actual carpet area, super built-up area, built-up area and some such terms must be clearly mentioned by the builders before the project is started. This could be done in pamphlets issued by them or any other advertisements that they carry out in public. 

This is mainly to prevent the builders from misleading the innocent and the vulnerable part of the society. 

3. Projects need to be cleared by appropriate authorities before going to floors! 
The necessary clearances need to be obtained before any project is started. There have been instances when the builders engage in fund-raising for the project much before the starting date and the investors run the risk of losing their money if the project does not get through. 

Also if the flats are completed before the green signal, then the occupancy of the house could be considered as illegal. This is one of the most significant points in the bill. 

The downers: 
Having seen some of the pros of the bill, the real drag may be due to the following points. 

1. The current projects do not fall under the purview of the bill: 
The real estate projects that are currently under-construction are not governed by this bill. Only those that are started from this time forth will be regulated under the act. This is actually a disappointing reality for those who have already put in their life’s savings in one project. 

2. Red tape surrounding the green signal: 
The investors and the developers alike are both sceptical of the delays that could be expected from the government’s side by way of authorization and approvals to be granted simply because of the aggregate number of projects that kickoff annually. 

This could also end up hiking the costs by several notches by the time the project is completed. The number of new projects will also fall as a result of the hold-up in the approvals. 

For a first regulation bill, the government has surely put in a lot of thought before finalising the final draft. That notwithstanding, there are still a lot more points to ponder over. These issues can definitely be rectified through vital amendments to the bill.

Read More

Saturday 14 September 2013

Indian laws on gifting of real estate are simple

The popular perception among non-resident Indians (NRIs) is that Indian real estate laws pertaining to inheritance of acquisition by way of gift are very complicated, but that is not really the case. In fact, they are quite simple. 

NRIs and persons of Indian origin (PIOs) can acquire residential or commercial property by way of gift from a resident of India or an NRI or a PIO. On the other hand, a foreign national of non-Indian origin resident outside India cannot acquire residential or commercial property in India by way of gift. 

However, any person resident outside India cannot acquire agricultural land/plantation/farm house in India by way of gift. 

What is a gift? 

Gift is defined under section 122 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1822 as: “the transfer of a certain existing immovable property made voluntarily and without consideration, by one person, called the “donor”, to another, called the “donee” and accepted by and on behalf of the donee.”
In other words, a gift is the transfer of an existing property and not of any future property. It must be made voluntarily and without compensation. It must be accepted by or on behalf of the donee. Such acceptance must be made during the lifetime of the donor. The donee can even be a minor (below 18 years of age). Also, the basic element of a gift is that it is given out of natural love and affection. 

Transfer of gift 
 
Section 123 provides that for making the gift of immovable property, the transfer must be affected by a registered instrument signed by the donor and attested by at least two witnesses. The transfer or handover may be made in the same way as goods sold may be delivered. Section 128 highlights that where gift consists of the donor’s whole property, the donee is personally liable for all the debts due by and liabilities of the donor at the time of the gift to the extent of property comprised therein. 

A deed of gift of an immovable property is required to be registered as provided under the Registration Act signed by or on behalf of the donor and attested by at least two witnesses. The title cannot pass without there being a registered deed of gift. 

Repatriation of funds 

Sale proceeds of immovable property acquired by way of gift should be credited to a non-resident (ordinary), or NRO, account only. From this NRO account, NRIs and PIOs can remit up to $1 million per financial year, subject to satisfaction of the authorized dealer and payment of applicable taxes. Rules and regulations on gifts very specifically clarify that any ambiguity in terms of process and handover should be avoided. NRIs very often witness such transactions but have no clarity on the process. 

Om Ahuja is CEO (residential services), Jones Lang LaSalle India. 
 
 
http://www.livemint.com/Money/z4OzbOFNqHuwzD1A0rMANM/Indian-laws-on-gifting-of-real-estate-are-simple.html?ref=dd
 

Read More

Wednesday 11 September 2013

Mumbai real estate units up 30% in H1 2013: Cushman & Wakefield study

Mumbai witnessed the launch of approximately 18,000 real estateunits during the first half of 2013; representing an increase of 30% compared to the first half of 2012. Of the total launches, 30% were witnessed in the western suburbs of Mumbai which had the highest share in new launches at locations like Andheri, Bandra, Malad and Goregaon. Navi Mumbai contributed 24% of the overall launches with the second phase of a large township project launched in Panvel. 

Cushman & Wakefield (C&W) in its quarterly report released on Tuesday said the central suburban stretch from Kurla to Mulund also contributed 20% of the new launches with two large projects launched in Mulund along with projects in Chembur, Kanjurmarg and Ghatkopar. Both the western and central suburbs have had a substantial increase in launch activity compared to 2012. With a number of projects currently under construction in Thane, the pace of new launches has declined in 2013. 

The prominent submarkets of South, South Central and Western suburbs prime witnessed substantial increase in capital values in the range of 17-24% over the past year due to low availabilities of quality ready apartments. Most high-end and luxury projects at these locations are still under-construction. The other submarkets like Central, Western Suburbs Thane and Navi Mumbai where launches were healthy witnessed capital values appreciate in the range of 3-6% for the mid and high-end segment due to increase input costs. 

Shveta Jain, Executive Director, Residential Services, Cushman & Wakefield said – “The share of the high-end segments in new launches have increased substantially in spite of stagnant demand levels in the city. This is largely due to aspects like high land prices and development cost that developers have chosen to go for higher ticket size projects even while the demand is more for affordable and mid – end segments. The subdued sales activity has prompted developers to resort to reducing configurations to reduce ticket size and offer subvention schemes to boost sales.”

The first half of 2012 also had a visible shift in product offerings for new launches. Contribution of the high-end segment increased substantially compared to H1 2012. With stagnant demand levels unsold inventory in under-construction projects are high, however no price correction has been witnessed with developers raising funds through other sources instead of reducing prices to increases sales. Launches in H1 2013 were concentrated in the western and central suburbs where a number of high-end projects were launched. 

With demand remaining subdued due to high prices, developers have tried to reduce ticket size by offering smaller configurations especially in South Mumbai locations. This move has helped reduce ticket size by up to 20-25% and increase sales velocity. Most new projects are also offering some form of subvention scheme or favourable payment schedules to attract buyers. A few prominent developers have also delayed launches and are tweaking plans to offer lower priced units to boost sales. 


PAN – INDIA TRENDS

An estimated 47,000 residential units were launched by organized developers in the second quarter of 2013 in major cities registering an increase of approximately 14% over the previous quarter. The unit launches for the first half of the year totaled to approximately 88,177 representing an increase of 11% over the period last year. The mid-end segment continued to constitute majority (58%) of the overall launches during H1 2013. Ahmedabad, Chennai, NCR and Pune were the only cities which witnessed a decline in new project launches in H1 2013 compared to the same period last year. 

Mid-end segment has witnessed a y-o-y capital appreciation of about 13-20%. In select micro markets across the cities, the capital appreciation has even exceeded 20%. Bengaluru and Hyderabad have witnessed notable capital appreciation for high-end segment due to increase in demand for such properties in the city.

Select cities saw fluctuation in rental and capital values during the quarter due to change in demand and supply dynamics and investment sentiment. Hyderabad’s submarkets saw the maximum variation in capital values ranging from 5-22% owing to revision of guidance values. Also, select micro markets of Bengaluru witnessed rise in capital values in the range of 15-21% in wake of limited supply and higher land acquisition costs. 

Meanwhile, some submarkets in Kolkata and Mumbai witnessed moderate capital appreciation in the range of 3-9% in Q2 2013. NCR on the contrary saw correction in the range of 5-9% in the high-end segment in the back drop of slow transaction activity coupled with cautious buyer sentiments. Rental values on the other hand witnessed uptrend in the range of 2-9% in select micro markets of Hyderabad and Kolkata. However, select high-end submarkets of NCR and Chennai witnessed a drop in rental values in the range of 3-11% owing to lower demand at higher price points.


Read More

Realty portals push many property brokers out of business

Fallinghome sales and rising competition from real estate portals has pushed many traditionalproperty brokers out of business while forcing others to work on wafer-thin margins. 

The market for property brokers, who had flourised during the real estate boom not so long ago, has shrunk with builders and individual sellers preferring direct sales or the services of real estate portals that are ready to facilitate deals for free. The shrinking market is also driving down the number of applications for real estate broking licences. 

In Bangalore, it has fallen by 10% over the last two years, said Rahul Pai, governing body member of Bangalore Realtors Association-India (BRA-I). "At the BRA-I AGM in August, members talked at large about the competition from various sources like internet portals that are posing stiff competition to the traditional brokers," said Pai. 

"This, added to the unfavorable market conditions in real estate, has made it worse for brokers. In fact, several small-time brokers have actually gone out of business and are coming to us looking for jobs." The gloom is evident in Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata too. 

In Mumbai, builders are approaching clients and investors directly through in-house marketing teams, which offer dedicated service to prospective investors and help save the 3% commission builders would have paid to property dealers. Developers are increasingly using direct marketing initiatives like e-mails, text messages and pre-launches to push their offerings. 

The few builders that are still working with brokers have reduced brokerage charges to 3%-4% from 6%-8% earlier. Most developers have also withdrawn the preferential location charges that were earlier being promised to brokers. 

"All large developers who are members of CREDAI (real estate apex body) have their own marketing team or are in the process of developing their own sales team for better customer service and building direct relationship with customers," said Harsh Vardhan Patodia, president, CREDAI Bengal and vice-president CREDAI National. 

Gaurav Gupta, joint secretary of Raj Nagar Extention Association, said: "With the slowdown happening in the market, most developers are now getting into direct sales and cutting down on the cost of the brokerage." Referral clients, too, are posing a threat to the broking community. 

"Builders are now luring new buyers through their present clientele, eliminating the role of agents and brokers," said Jyoti Shroff, partner at Bangalore-based real estate consultancy Tirupati Associates. "A reference of a prospective client gets the buyer up to Rs 50,000 discount. This has led to fall in our business by about 50%, especially in the last six months." 

Akhil Kapur of real estate brokerage firm AJ Housing said his revenue is down by 20%-30%. "The number of transactions has not changed but the price band of transactions has come down, which indirectly affects my revenue," Kapur said. Brokers in Delhi echo the same sentiment. 

"Transactions are not happening and there is no movement in the market. Our business has come down by more than 50%," said Sumit Joshi, director, Real Credit Consultancy, a mid-sized real estate broking firm in Noida. "Brokers who are unable to sustain are relocating from premier locations to smaller offices elsewhere and are also trying their hand at other businesses." 

Websites, too, are playing spoilsport for brokers. "Certain developers are at the moment more bullish on the online sites and social media to promote their properties among NRIs and strengthening their direct sales," Gupta said. 

Bangalore-based Common-Floor.com is sending out chauffer-driven BMWs and Mercedes to pick up premium clients for sight visits—facilities that a broker would never be able to match. "There is now a market trend of online customer enquiries, which are being serviced directly by the builders, and this is picking up to the extent of 15% to 20% of the total sales in the below Rs 50 lakh segment. In this category, the main lead generation takes place through the project publicity and promotion," CREDAI's Patodia said. 

Unlike the markets of north and south, the role of brokers was elementary in the east. But, over the past few years, the trend of brokers marketing a project had picked up in West Bengal. Following the rough patch now, brokers across the east are in a fix as builders endorse orthodox ways of direct sale. 

"Kolkata market is not only run by end users but also salaried speculators, who do not live in the city. The latter generally seek brokers' help to locate and zero in on a property. As investments have gone down in real estate, the broking market too has invariably seen a crash," said Sanjay Jain, MD, Siddha Group, which recently sold 70% of its property through direct sales.



Read More

Housing slump: Real estate market crumbles as economy slows

The Orbit Grand, a block-size complex designed to have at least 26 floors of elegant apartments, an extensive array of ground-floor stores and abundant parking for the chauffeured cars of residents and shoppers, was supposed to be a diadem of India's real estate market.

Now it is turning into a symbol of the slumping fortunes of property developers and owners in a once-promising emerging economy. Construction of the Orbit Grand has almost completely stalled at the 10th floor, the tower crane at the site seldom moves and the builder has defaulted on its loan.

"There's no real work going on right now. There's just a minimum number of workers coming in to do small things," said Alam Sheikh, an electrician who is one of just 14 builders left at the site.

The real estate market in cities across India is crumbling as the Indian economy slows. The rupee has dropped nearly 20 percent against the dollar since early May, scaring away foreign investors.

The Reserve Bank of India raised a key short-term interest rate for commercial banks' borrowing by two full percentage points in mid-July, to 10.25 percent, mainly to prevent further declines in the rupee. To put a brake on the flow of money leaving the country, the central bank followed up last month with a regulation banning Indians from transferring money overseas for real estate purchases.

Rising financing costs are all the more painful because India's real estate developments take a long time to build because of a vast and often corrupt regulatory apparatus. Publicly traded real estate investment groups in India are heavily in debt, so they struggle to make interest payments and are not in a position to bankroll further projects.

That combination has produced almost unanimous bearishness about the short-term prospects for residential, commercial and industrial real estate prices in India. Sanjay Dutt, the executive managing director for South Asia at Cushman & Wakefield, the world's largest privately held commercial real estate company, predicted that prices would fall 10 percent in big Indian cities and 15 percent on the outskirts of large cities, where many speculative projects have been built. He said, "Given the universal sentiment of the market, there could be a sharp correction between now and Gudi Padwa," an annual festival next March that has long been considered in India an auspicious time to buy real estate.

What has sustained prices so far, and what might prevent more serious losses than those predicted by Dutt, has been the willingness of developers to hold growing inventories of unsold apartments, shops and offices without offering price discounts. The volume of real estate transactions has slumped in India as developers have refused to offer discounts for fear of starting a market rout.

"If they drop prices, investors will panic and it will be a self-fulfilling prophecy," causing further declines in prices, said Siddharth Yog, a co-founder and managing partner of the Xander Group, a large international real estate investment firm started in 2005. That was the year India began allowing foreign institutional investors into its real estate market.

But with sellers refusing to cut prices, many potential buyers are losing interest. Devkinandan Agarwal, a Mumbai broker with three-quarters of his business in residential real estate and the rest in commercial real estate, said that until the last few months, he had at least three or four separate meetings each day with genuine, interested buyers; now he has only one a day.

"There are now only actual users in the market, there is hardly anyone buying real estate as an investment," he said.

One longstanding complaint about business practices in India is that the country's banks lend heavily to a wealthy elite who often put very little of their own money into deals. These developers rely on minority investors and bank loans for most of the financing. India's debt tribunals, for companies unable to repay what they have borrowed, have tended to move slowly. They are reluctant to force founders of companies to incur large losses even in corporate reorganizations in which creditors and minority investors lose heavily.

Raghuram Rajan, the new governor of the Reserve Bank of India, said at his inaugural news conference last Wednesday that he would try to change this. "Promoters do not have a divine right to stay in charge regardless of how badly they mismanage an enterprise, nor do they have the right to use the banking system to recapitalize their failed ventures," he said.

Bimal Jalan, a former chief economic adviser to the Indian government who was also the governor of the central bank from 2000 to 2004, said in a telephone interview from New Delhi that the broader Indian economy could escape serious harm even if real estate prices did decline. India has low rates of homeownership, so families are less likely to be worried about falling home prices and cut household spending.

Housing finance has played a small role in the Indian banking system, so Indian banks are less vulnerable to real estate downturns than banks in the West, Jalan said. Regulatory obstacles have slowed the pace of construction and limited the number of buildings to finance.

The construction of the Orbit Grand here illustrates many of the issues in Indian real estate, including costly regulatory delays. The Orbit Corporation, a publicly traded Mumbai developer, began building the complex and several others in western India with a $62 million loan in 2008 from LIC Housing Finance Ltd., based in Mumbai. But a combination of litigation over whether Orbit had full title to the entire site, which Orbit did not win until last March, together with a new set of municipal real estate regulations introduced in late 2010, slowed the pace of construction and prevented Orbit from preselling apartments. The company actually had to erect two separate buildings, with plans to join them together later, because the litigation, a chronic problem in Indian real estate, delayed construction on the 30 percent of the site's acreage that was in question.

"This led to a severe cash crunch at the company and resulted in the stalling construction of the project," said Ramashrya Yadav, the chief financial officer at Orbit.

Orbit defaulted on the LIC loan at the end of last year with a little more than a third of the original balance not yet repaid. LIC put the Orbit Grand into receivership in early August. But as often happens in India, Orbit has kept control of the sites.

Yadav said that Orbit had now raised the money to finish the projects, and it received the needed environmental clearances four weeks ago. The Orbit Grand stalled with 10 stories completed out of 26, although the firm is seeking regulatory approval to extend the building up to 36 stories. Another project, less than a mile away, Orbit Terraces, stalled with 40 of 60 floors built.

Orbit requires the permission of LIC to sell units, and any sales must go toward the defaulted loan. Mr. Yadav predicted that Orbit would be able to repay the defaulted loan within seven months, while acknowledging that the company faced a tough market for selling apartments. "As liquidity dries up, a price fall is also imminent," he said. LIC declined to comment.

While foreign investors in Indian real estate are licking their wounds after the 17.5 percent fall in the rupee against the dollar since the start of May, they do have one consolation. The longstanding shortage of space in many Indian cities because of regulatory barriers to new construction translates into high occupancy rates and steady rental incomes for commercial and residential real estate, at least in rupee terms.

"In terms of the underlying portfolio, tenant demand has been very good — there has been limited construction in the last few years because of tight credit, and that has slowed the supply of new offices," said Christopher Heady, the Blackstone partner overseeing Asian real estate investments. The asset management firm Blackstone has invested $600 million in Indian real estate, mainly office complexes in Bangalore, a center of the information technology and outsourcing industries in southern India.

These sectors have a lot of multinationals and big Indian companies that are reliable renters, Mr. Heady said, adding that these clients are "continuing to grow pretty rapidly."

But leaving aside a few exporters of services like computer software, most of the economy is struggling. Manish Jain moved his jewelry store last January into retail space at the base of the unfinished Orbit Grand, but has found that customers are more interested in pawning jewelry they already have — and the people doing the pawning are increasingly those wearing suits, not just shirts or saris. "They are going through a tough financial crisis," he said. "At first, we only saw people from the service class, lower-income people, but now we are seeing business people, too."




Read More

Monday 9 September 2013

Subbarao put serious pressure on real estate

Former Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor Duvurri Subbarao’s parting shot – red flagging of 20-80 schemes – was one among his several moves that put pressure on the real estate sector.

Former Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor, Duvurri Subbarao’s parting shot – red flagging of 20-80 schemes – was one among his several moves that put pressure on the real estate sector.

The most famous one – stopping the teaser loans of the State Bank of India. When RBI asked SBI to stop teaser loan products in a couple of years, there were criticisms that buyers would be hurt. But the way interest rates have risen/stayed high and may continue to be high for some more time, a teaser product at 8% - 8.5% for the first two-three years would have been suicidal for buyers.

RBI, under his regime, took several steps to ensure that home buyers did not go overboard. For example, banks and housingfinance companies (HFCs) were asked not to pay registration and stamp duty fees as a part of the home loan. These duties contributed as much as 5-8% of the property price. In addition, the loan-to-value of home loans was capped to 80%.

Many banks and HFCs, earlier, were quite liberal about this number. Some ended up paying more than 100% of the property price (after including stamp duty and registration). They would even offer a home improvement loan, along with the home loan. By stopping all that, RBI tried to reduce the leverage of buyers.

Several other measures, proposed by the Damodaran Committee, were implemented. The most important one was the banning of the pre-payment penalty for floating rate loans. This helped buyers who wanted to switch to a cheaper rate to another bank. The biggest beneficiary of this, according to industry players, was SBI which played on its ‘lowest-rate’ card well. 

His last move, cautioning banks about 20:80 scheme, comes at a very good time. With the passage of the Land Acquisition Bill, builders are already upset about how the price of land will rise by a good three to four times. Since the cost of land is almost 30-50% of the total cost of property, this could lead to further rise in prices.

By asking banks not to fund such projects and cautioning buyers about the credit rating if the builder fails, RBI is clearly giving a signal that builders need to bring in their own money to buy land. Once the project takes off, they can sell it to buyers to raise money for construction purposes.

Bankers said that in this way, RBI is trying to ensure that there is no deviation from Subbarao’s predecessor Y V Reddy’s diktat that banks cannot fund land purchases. Also, it is likely to force builders to complete existing projects and sell them before moving on to the next one. There are already talks that this move could lead to fall in real estate prices.

Of course, the performance of Reserve Bank of India governors are normally weighed by ‘inflation containment’ and ‘growth support’ through their interest rate or liquidity regime.

No wonder, in his last speech D Subbarao chose to respond to Finance Minister P Chidambaram’s famous statement last year – "if the government has to walk alone to face the challenge of growth then, 'we will walk alone' with... "I do hope Finance Minister Chidambaram will one day say: “I am often frustrated by the Reserve Bank, so frustrated that I want to go for a walk, even if I have to walk alone. But thank God, the Reserve Bank exists.” Only time will tell whether Subbarao’s obsession with inflation was correct or not.

But he scores heavily when it comes to making life difficult for the real estate sector. Like a banker says: “If he had told banks not to allow builders to rollover loans three-four years back, prices would have corrected sharply by now and buying activity would have started aggressively.”



Read More

Friday 6 September 2013

Home rule: Property prices shoot up 50-150% since 2008 even as realty stocks nosedive

Invest in their apartments, and you will get rich. But invest in their shares and you will be poorer. Unlike in other sectors, values of shares of listed real estate companies do not reflect the growing value of their products.

Sample this: Investments made in shares of real estate companies like Delhi-basedUnitechBSE -0.59 % and DLF, Mumbai-basedIndiabulls Real EstateBSE 0.25 % or Bangalore-based Purvankara in 2008 would have crashed to half or to a fifth of their value by now whereas in the same period, returns from investments made in homes built by the same companies would have risen anywhere between 50% and 150% or more.

If one had bought an apartment in any Gurgaon-based apartment building of DLFBSE 0.15 % — India's biggest builder — in 2008, the investment would have, by now, appreciated 60-175%. Had the same money been used to purchase DLF's shares the same year, that investment would have eroded to just 20%. Investors of Unitech, Indiabulls and other real estate firms would have a similar story to tell.




The ET Realty Index has been the worst performer since fiscal year 2008 in comparison to all other indices falling 77%. "Stock prices are sensitive to a number of factors — negative news about industry, regulatory changes, interest rates for construction finance, home loan rates, future earnings expectations," says Ajay Chandra, MD of Unitech. On the other hand, home prices are a factor of demand in the market and state of the micro and macro economy, he adds.

"Properties are better-performing assets than stocks of real estate companies that built them. Buy their homes rather than their stocks," says Sanjay Bansal, who runs investment bank Aurum Equity Partners.

In the last few years, the rise in property prices in areas where trading of apartments is rampant — in the north of India — has been much higher because of a nexus between developers and investors. Stock prices, on the other hand, reflect the financial stress of the entire real estate industry. According to an analysis done by the ET Intelligence Group, the financial stress levels of these companies have been the highest in the last five years.

For a sample of the top 25 listed real estate companies, the interest payments have multiplied four-fold in the last five years, but the operating profits have halved. Of these 25 listed firms, 10 have lost over 80% of their market value, eight over 50-80%, and only one company has given positive returns. While quarterly results are a benchmark of performance for most companies, for real estate firms they mean very little as revenues for a real estate firm are booked only if the construction of a project moves forward.

"A company is evaluated on financials but in the real estate space, almost every macroeconomic issue impacts the performance of the company. Even job losses in, say the IT sector, will impact a real estate company's performance as sales will decline," says a top executive of a listed real estate company, who requested not to be named. "Over-leveraging is another big reason for the current state of the developers," says Samantak Das, national head of research at property consultant Knight Frank.

In fiscal year 2008-09 when liquidity led to a steep increase in real estate prices, developers thought prices will endlessly increase and borrowed ambitiously. They did not expect any slowdown in demand, but the slowdown hit immediately in the next three quarters and the fundamentals imploded. In a recent report, Knight Frank has said slowing sales are impacting the cash flows and the real estate industry will continue to be under stress for an extended period.



Read More

Thursday 5 September 2013

Is RBI working overtime to burst the real estate bubble?

A series of steps announced by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) gives the impression that there is a deliberate move to bring downreal estate prices, especially residential ones. Despite poor sales, residential real estate prices have been on the rise though commercial real estate prices have been declining. The divergence in trend between the two has been seen since the 2008 Lehman crisis. 

Though volume off-take slowed down post the lehman crisis, residential real estate prices refuse to fall as they were artificially propped up by builders. As a result of this, the country is sitting on nearly 700 million square feet of unsold real estate. Though real estate sales are region and price specific, annual sales are in the region of 250 million square feet. In other words we are sitting on nearly three years of inventory, assuming there are no new launches coming in. 

Sitting on unsold and ready stock, builders had turned creative in the sales, devising either new financing schemes or offering freebies and discounts to push sales. One such scheme which had gained popularity was the 20-80 scheme where a buyer pays only 20% upfront and the remaining 80% on possession. Banks however, would disburse the remaining amount to the developer who would take care of the interest payment for the client. 

This was a win-win scheme as far as the customer and developer was concerned. Developer was ensured of a lower cost of fund as well as he was given the entire amount at the beginning of the project. However, some developers started to misuse these funds and utilize the liquidity to either pay-off their earlier debts or purchase new parcels of land. 

Similarly on the other end the buyer, who was mostly an investor, was able to lock in a property at construction stage (low price) by paying only 20%. By the time the property was ready in 3-4 years and prices would appreciate, his return on amounted invested was huge. This scheme gave him the benefit of leverage without the incremental cost of funding. 

For banks, the biggest risk was the developer. In case of delays or defaults, they would have to chase the developer, who is generally a tougher nut to crack than the individual buyer. 

RBI saw through this game and decided to stop the music before the party spreads and loans become toxic. The scheme was largely operational in metro cities in around 200 projects. However, abruptly stopping the scheme would further squeeze liquidity out of the system. 

Real estate prices are already correcting and such measures will only speed up the fall as developers turn desperate to sell their inventory.


Read More

Tuesday 3 September 2013

Real estate market: How to build India's future cities

The main reason that the Indian real estate market finds itself in trouble today is that prices have become unaffordable, even for most professionals. The underlying reason for this is an artificial scarcity of land in our cities.

There are several reasons for this: states have zoning restrictions, land-use rules and so on. This need not be a bad thing, but these rules are administered by inefficient and corrupt bodies. Clearances and permits follow a labyrinthine process and involve the greasing of many palms.

The resultant shortage of land where apartments, offices and shops can be built inflates prices. Today, as demand starts to weaken across property markets countrywide, we need to think of ways to build really affordable real estate.

First, the government must identify tracts of land to build new urban projects. Once identified, the change of land use from farm or fallow land to commercial or residential must be automatic, involving no bureaucratic meddling. With conversion becoming automatic, middlemen and touts will disappear.

The price of farmland will then reflect the real value of residential or commercial property. That will be a huge incentive to sellers, who will realise much higher rates than unconverted farmland. Once land sellers buy into this model, much of India's current worries with land acquisition and construction will go. Property prices, too, are likely to come down to reasonable levels as the "scarcity of land" argument disappears.

Wherever possible, the government should encourage the building of high-rises, which use all resources, including land, power, water and parking facilities much more efficiently than low-rise construction. As India urbanises, we cannot live with archaic models of land administration that encourage graft and curtail the supply of land.


Read More
Designed By Seo Blogger Templates